Today’s news that the German economy, the powerhouse of Europe, had narrowly avoided a ‘technical recession’ in the second half of 2018 is another red light flashing for the world economy. In 2018, German real GDP growth was 1.5% down from 2.2% in 2017. This was the weakest growth rate in five years And in the second half of last year, the growth was slowing fast, up only 1.1% yoy compared to 2% in Q2 2018. It fell 0.2% in Q2 over Q1 and rose just 0.3% in Q3.
As for Germany’s industrial sector, that clearly is in recession. Industrial production in Germany decreased 4.7% in November of 2018 over the same month in the previous year.
German companies have been hit by poorer sales from a world economic slowdown and political uncertainty surrounding Brexit and the trade war between the US and China. The UK, US and China are all among German makers’ biggest markets.
The collapse is particularly noticeable in the very important auto sector, where the global slowdown, sharp drops in demand and the restrictions on diesel car emissions have destroyed the auto sector globally. Passenger vehicle sales in China, the world’s largest car market, fell for the first time last year since the early 1990s, down 4.1%. Sales in December were down 15.8 per cent from the same month last year, the steepest monthly fall in more than six years and the sixth consecutive month of declining sales.
Germany has dragged down industrial production in the Euro Area. It fell 3.3% year-on-year in November. It is the first annual fall in industrial output since January of 2017 and the biggest since November of 2012.
Indeed, the German experience is being followed in varying degrees across the globe, at least in the major economies. The global PMI, the key business activity indicator, shows a slowing down. The level of activity is still above 50 (and therefore indicates expansion) and is not yet down to the recession depths of 2012 or 2016, but it is on its way.
And the global PMI for ‘new orders’ shows a slowdown in both manufacturing and services globally.
And among the so-called ‘emerging economies’, emergence is being replaced by submergence. Real GDP in Latin America as a whole is contracting on annualised basis, according to investment bank JP Morgan.
Among the so-called BRICS (the major emerging economies), China’s industrial production slowed in November to 5.4% yoy, the smallest rate since the mini-recession of early 2016. Industrial production in Brazil contracted 0.9% in November, while Russia’s industrial production slowed to 2.4% yoy from 3.7% in October. Russian manufacturing output stopped growing altogether. Manufacturing output growth in South Africa slowed to 1.6% November from 2.8% in October. Even the fastest-growing major economy in the world, India, took a hit. India’s industrial production growth slowed sharply to 0.5% yoy in November, the smallest gain since June 2017 and manufacturing output actually fell 0.4%.
My post outlining an economic forecast in 2019 offered several different short-term indicators for the direction of the world economy.
The first was credit and the so-called ‘inverted yield curve’ ie the difference in the interest rate received for buying 10yr US government bonds and 2yr government bonds. In a ‘normal’ situation, the interest rate earned for holding a longer term bond will be higher because the bond purchaser cannot get the bond back for ten years and there is higher risk from changes in inflation or default compared to a bond held over two years. But on some rare occasions, the interest rate on two-year bonds can go higher than on ten-year ones. This is because the interest rate is being driven up by hikes in the central bank rate and/or because investors are fearful of a recession, so they want to hold as much government paper as possible. They sell their stocks and buy bonds. Every time the yield curve inverts, an economic recession in the US at least follows within a year or so.
Well, investors have been selling stocks and the stock market has dived. But we still don’t have an inverted yield curve yet, partly because the Federal Reserve appears to have decided not to raise its policy rate so quickly any more – precisely because it does not want to provoke a recession when the world is slowing down.
The second indicator is the price of copper. As copper enters much of the components of industrial output, its price can be a good short-term gauge of the strength of economic activity globally. Well, the copper price is down from its peak in 2017 but still not at levels seen in the mini-recession of early 2016.
The most important indicator in my view is the movement of profits for the capitalist sector of the major economies. This drives investment and employment and thus incomes and spending. But it is not possible to get such a high frequency measure – indeed most profit reports are quarterly at best. Goldman Sachs, the investment bankers have made some forecasts, however for this year. Their economists conclude that “In terms of proﬁts, we do expect a sharp slowdown. In every region we expect proﬁt growth to be below the current bottom-up consensus, and to be around 5% in 2019. In the case of the US, in particular, this would represent a very sharp slowdown from the 22% EPS growth expected for 2018.” They ‘benchmark’ this profit forecast against their measure of ‘growth momentum’ and find that it “implies a further sharp deterioration in growth.” But not yet a recession forecast.
These indicators all suggest a sharp slowdown in global growth, particularly in manufacturing and industry. The US yield curve is close to inversion but not yet inverted; the copper price is down but not yet at lows; and global profits growth has slowed but is not yet falling. So the amber light for a global slump in 2019 has still not turned red – yet.
3 thoughts on “From amber to red?”
Recession or no recession, fact is the European Dream is over.
“But on some rare occasions, the interest rate on two-year bonds can go higher than on ten-year ones. This is because the interest rate is being driven up by hikes in the central bank rate and/or because investors are fearful of a recession, so they want to hold as much government paper as possible. They sell their stocks and buy bonds. Every time the yield curve inverts, an economic recession in the US at least follows within a year or so.”
My understanding is that Marx explained credit gets stretched to finance overproduction that has not been sold to final buyers. Producers need more cash to finance their capacity and stocks and payables because they are not getting enough cash from sales. So they borrow short term and push short term rates up. In crisis way up since cash needed to avoid bankruptcy.
I thought this was widely accepted as the reason inverted yield curve is a good leading indicator for recession and hence why “investors” fear recession.
The quote suggests I am wrong about wide acceptance?
Do others agree with the way it is put in the quote?
The European media are constantly throwing “loss of reality” to British elites and still give them good advice on what to do better.
The loss of reality lies on both sides: the British ruling class had dominated Europe and the world until 1914 and then thought that it could rule the world with the Commonwealth even without Europe. The French elite clung to their colonial empire, even as Paris was occupied by the Nazi hordes. And after the devastating World War, the powerful in Washington, London and Paris believed that they could build and maintain a haven of stability and “moderate capitalism” in (Western) Europe, while in all other world predatory capitalism was launched. The tamed capital competition in Europe is over. The EU has still overcome the economic crisis of 2008 with great difficulty. The chronic chaos in the Middle East and Africa, the imminent decline in South America and the trade dispute between the major powers USA and China are now ringing the bell for an EU that is permanently weakened by the Brexit.