A burst of optimism: unfounded?

There has been a burst of optimism about the state of the world economy since the beginning of the year.  At the end of last year, the consensus of many economic forecasts was that the major economies were heading into a slump in 2023.  Most of the international agencies were forecasting a slowdown in economic growth at best and at worst a contraction in national outputs of the major economies.  I too posted a forecast for 2023 as “the impending slump”.

But now the mood has changed.  The consensus view is that the G7 economies (with the sorry exception of the UK) will avoid a slump this year.  Sure, there will be slowdown compared to 2022, but the major economies are going to achieve a ‘soft landing’ or even no landing at all, but just motor on, if at a low rate of growth.  The international agencies have upgraded their forecast for growth.

Whereas the Eurozone economies were expected to contract in 2023 because of the energy crisis and Russia-Ukraine war, now the EU Commission reckons that the region will avoid a ‘technical recession’ this year.   The winter was warmer than expected and oil and gas reserves built up by Eurozone governments (at great expense) have managed to avoid power outages despite applying sanctions on Russian energy exports.  Unemployment has stayed low and consumers have continued to spend more, using up savings built up during the COVID lockdowns.  At least, that is the explanation provided for renewed optimism.

The IMF too has joined the party in revising up its forecasts.  And the IMF chief economist now firmly rules out a recession in the major economies this year (again with the exception of the UK).  Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, said 2023 “could well represent a turning point”, with economic conditions improving in subsequent years. “We are well away from any [sign of] global recession.” Its world growth forecast for this year has been lifted from a previous 2.7% to 2.9%, basing its estimate, not just on a warm winter in Europe but also on the opening-up of the Chinese economy after the end of its zero-COVID policy.  This would boost production globally and also demand for European exports.  Half of this year’s forecast expansion will come from China and India alone as the major advanced economies will slow to 1-2% growth, with the UK the only major economy contracting.

As for the US, the mood is very positive.  Last month’s net job figures showed a jump of over 500,000, with the official unemployment rate falling to 3.4%, its lowest in 54 years!  Also the latest retail sales data showed a sharp jump up in January, suggesting Americans are continuing to spend and keep the economy buoyant. As the labour market is booming and consumers are spending, all talk of a recession this year is clearly baloney.

But wait, let’s examine the data more closely.  Continuing with the US economy, the best performing among the top seven (G7) capitalist economies, much of the last year’s increase in employment and the low unemployment rate can be explained by statistical adjustments and by the large number of people who have not returned to work after COVID, thus causing a very tight labour market.  January saw a statistical adjustment that added in an extra 1.6m to add to the payrolls that had been missing from data.  And here’s the other thing.  Back last March 2022, there were 132.6m Americans in full-time work. In January 2023, there were 132.6m.  So there was no increase in full-time jobs in ten months. Instead part-time jobs rose by 1.5m!  What we have is a ‘strong’ labour market where workers can only get part-time, often casual work, and where they often take two or three jobs to make ends meet in the face of rocketing prices of necessities.

And remember even if the international agencies have raised their forecasts for this year just a little, they are still forecasting very weak growth in 2023 – indeed economic growth way below the ten year average pre-pandemic, which in turn was below the average in the years before the Great Recession of 2008.  The IMF calculates that the pandemic slump has ‘scarred’ economies to the tune of an average 4% pts loss of real output since 2019 relative to trend growth before.

Even though the IMF has ticked its forecast up along with a more optimistic view of this year’s economic activity, its 2.9% global forecast is still well below the average of 3.8% a year during the Long Depression of the 2010s, which in turn was a downgrade of growth before the Great Recession of 2008-9. The fastest growing G7 economy this year will be Japan at 1.8%. The UK will be the only economy in a slump. The Eurozone is forecast to grow only 0.7%.

The Eurozone economy grew just 0.1% in Q4 2022, so no contraction. However, this figure included the ludicrous GDP growth recorded for Ireland. Germany and Italy contracted while France just escaped contraction. Outside the Eurozone, both Sweden and the UK contracted. Overall investment is still below the level at the end of 2019.

It’s a similar story in the US.  US real GDP growth has slowed from 5.4% yoy in Q4 2021 to just 1.0% yoy in Q4 2022 (by Greg Daco).  More significant, inventories (ie stockpiling goods) contributed over half the annual rate in Q4.  Sales to Americans (consumers and producers) were virtually flat, while business investment rose at under a 2% rate.  

US real GDP growth has finally returned to its pre-pandemic trend rate but only after three years of recession and below trend growth (by Jason Furman).

And let’s weigh in with the factors that suggest the US is heading for recession this year.  First, a sizeable section of the economy is already contracting.  The housing market has been slumping for months.  Productivity growth has been virtually non-existent, thus keeping output growth dependent on more employees and driving up production costs per unit of output, both for raw materials and for wages. 

Indeed, the manufacturing sector in most major economies is already contracting.  The US manufacturing PMI ( a measure of activity) is well below the contraction point of 50.

And there is the rising cost of borrowing.  The Federal Reserve, the ECB and the Bank of England are all engaged in raising their policy rates of interest,ostensibly to reduce inflation rates that have rocketed in the last year or so.  I have argued in several posts that the inflationary spike is not caused either by previously ‘excessive’ monetary injections or by ‘excessive’ demand generated by too much government spending – and certainly not from ‘excessive’ wage demands by workers.  The cause lies with the failure of the capitalist sector to supply enough to meet the demands of workers and capitalists as economies came out of the COVID slump; particularly in energy and food – and of course, the fossil fuel and other companies have taken advantage of shortages by raising prices. 

As Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, once said: “Monetary policy will not increase the supply of semiconductor chips, it will not increase the amount of wind (no, really), and nor will it produce more HGV drivers.” Nevertheless, the central banks continue with their ‘shock therapy’, which is only increasing the cost of borrowing and servicing existing debt while having little effect on inflation rates. 

It’s true that headline inflation has peaked and is beginning to fall. But ECB board member Isabel Schnabel admitted only recently that the recent fallback in the headline inflation rate was not down to ECB policy. “You can’t say monetary policy is having such an impact that we can hope for inflation to reach our 2% target in the medium term.”

Inflation is subsiding a little mainly due to the peaking of energy and food prices.  ‘Core’ inflation (excluding food and energy) is proving ‘stickier’. According to the IMF, even by 2024, projected average annual headline and core inflation will still be above pre-pandemic levels in more than 80 percent of countries. 

Moreover, this is the inflation rate, not the level of prices.  Even if inflation slows, it still means that price levels will remain much higher than they were before the pandemic – 15% higher in the case of the US, and much higher in other economies.  That is a permanent hit to living standards and the ability to spend more, as wage increases and now even profit rises cannot keep up.

And what happens to profits is key in a capitalist economy.  During the recovery in 2021 after the COVID slump, profits rocketed, partly from government subsidies and partly from the ability to raise prices.  But now the worm is turning.  Rising interest costs are squeezing at one end, while slowing economic growth and sales are squeezing at the other. Profit margins are falling from highs.  According to FactSet, US corporate operating profits (sales minus costs) are falling. 

As I have argued ad nauseam, if profits for capitalists start to fall and continue to fall, that will lead to an ‘investment strike’ and the laying off workers in order to reduce losses.  Already we have seen that falling profits in the media-tech sector has meant sharp reductions in workforces.  That will spread to the rest of the economy if other sectors cut back. 

All the so-called ‘high frequency’ indicators of economic activity are signalling recession in the US economy.  First, the bond yield curve remains inverted – I have explained before what this means as a reliable indicator of an impending recession.  The inversion is now -80bp, which has not been seen since three months before the deep slump of 1981-2. 

The New York Fed recession probability indicator stands at 57%, higher than before the Great Recession.

And the very pertinent Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI) recorded its 10th straight monthly decline – the longest streak of declines since the global financial crash of 2007-8. The trajectory of the US LEI continues to signal a recession over the next 12 months.

Maybe the major economies won’t go into a slump this year.  But even if the stats don’t show a recession, it will feel like it for millions in the advanced capitalist economies and for the billions in the so-called Global South, when output growth slows to no more than 1% a year in the advanced economies and well below previous rates in the Global South, when employment stops improving and unemployment starts to rise, while inflation rates continue to outstrip wage growth.

9 thoughts on “A burst of optimism: unfounded?

  1. My impression is that they expected China would suffer from a catastrophe from the “abandonment of Zero Covid”, where, according to those vaunted Western models, it would lose something between 1.5-9 million lives in two months.

    Evidently, those models turned out to be false, and China relaxed Zero Covid with unparalleled success. Some weeks later, China’s GDP growth for 2023 was rapidly reviewed up first to +5%, then to +6%. Since, as we’ve seen from Biden’s latest speech on Balloongate, that the West is irreversibly dependent on China for its economic chains, the Western financial institutes followed suit and extrapolated China’s success case to the whole world.

    Another factor for the optimism I’ve observed from those guys comes from the fact that many of them — coming from finance — still see this inflation as merely fruit of the overprinting of money done during the apex of the pandemic, so, in their vision, the central banks are merely undoing what they caused in the first place. That’s the logical assumption of an equilibrium model: what the monetary policy can give, it can take.

    As for the West’s concrete case, I agree with Roberts. As I had already commented in the “demographic crisis” post, fixed labor productivity — let alone falling — is bad news for capitalism. It will have to resort of extensive economic growth, which will eventually have to imply in some form of rising birth rates, which will only fuel far-right ideologies, already at its second renaissance (2016-?).

    I predict a total defeat of the last remnants of the Western Left and the conclusion of the final phase of the conversion of the First World into a fascist empire (a Fascist International): we are already witnessing it as we speak, as the large strikes by the last forces of the trade-unionist movement of Western Europe are already starting to get defeated one after the other. And we know what happens in the West when the trade-unionist movement is crushed. Hint: it’s not the communist revolution.

  2. The longer recession is “avoided”, the longer the current industrial overproduction of commodities relative to gold production continues. The longer it continues, the greater the discrepancy between the production of commodities and the production of gold. The greater the discrepancy, the more the money capitalists will demand gold, increasing the price of gold and the interest that they will charge to lend US Dollars. The higher interest rates rise, the sharper the recession and the greater the chance that the entire global credit and banking system will collapse, making the Great Depression look like a walk in the park. So yes, capitalist media, keep having your celebrations of a “soft landing” while I wait eagerly for what’s about to come. At the end of the day, Marx was correct and I will laugh smugly as the celebrities, landlords, and bourgeoisie face financial ruin.

  3. I’ve been reading your work The Great Recession and just finished digesting the very helpful section & graph you titled “From Kondratiev to Kitchin: the cycles of capitalist motion”, where these “arc cycles” are overlaid and extend from 1946 to 2019.

    Given the insight gleaned from overlaying these cycles, shouldn’t we see the beginning of new “up wave” phases for Kondratiev, value rate of profit, Kuznets, Juglar and Kitchin? I’m trying to make sense of all this and apply it to the current situation (which doesn’t look very good, especially for those of us in the construction trades). Thanks!

  4. The fall in the BDI, from 5497 in 2021 to 538 2023, reflects lower demand for these vessels and vice versa. As these carriers transport important raw materials such as coal, iron ore, cement, etc. which are further used as inputs for intermediate and finished goods, a suppressed demand (translating into lower freight cost) is not a healthy sign for the global economy….

  5. Alfredo the opposite is the case. Since 2014-6 we have seen a down wave interrupted by COVID funds, but now reasserting itself.

    As I said in a comment on your Facebook blog, while Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) produces depression, Seasonal Adjustment Disorder (SUD) produces euphoria. These Ukrainian adjustments mean that the divergence between the soft data (surveys) and the official data has never been wider nor more enduring. In the past, invariably, when the soft data which is more time sensitive, fell below the official data, recessions always ensued.

    I believe the best estimate is that provided by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) based on tax data. It is obviously impossible to adjust tax takings so they paint a clearer picture. Accordingly the CBO projects only a 0.3% growth rate for the US economy during 2023. 0.3% at a time of elevated inflation could is within the statistical era range between growth and contraction. In any case, over the course of the first five months of this financial year which began October 2022, tax takings in real terms fell 13%, not consistent with a growing economy. https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2023-02/58848-Outlook.pdf

    Finally the CPB World Trade Monitor covering December will be released on Friday. https://www.cpb.nl/en Undoubtedly it will show that global trade and production shrank in December. This means that during the last quarter of 2022 the world experienced a global industrial recession. This cannot be dismissed. Industry dominates the economy; transfers from it funds a large portion of the services sector, its discounts funds the wholesale and retail sector while its outputs determines the size of the transport sector. (In addition it provides the greater part of corporate profits.) Add all these back in and it is likely we are talking about half the world economy (I have yet to calculate this on a global scale though I have done it on a national scale. Basically the methodology is to take the Gross Output of Industry and then add back the GVA for wholesale and retail, and once done divide this total into the Gross Output figure for Private Industries.)

  6. Could anyone tell me, what is the real inflation of the dollar? Because if it is 1 to 2% more than the official rate, the USA and EU have been in depression for a long time.

  7. RMaestri the biggest issue in the inflation data is owner occupier rents which has a 23% weighting in both the CPI and the PCE. It tends to reduce inflation on the way up and increase inflation on the way down because it is a lagging indicator. In Europe Eurostat both provides a CPI with and without these rents. Unfortunately the BLS in the USA does not. Generally inflation forvthe bottom 60% of income earners in understated.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: