UK: the agony and the ecstasy

The Bank of England chief economist certainly put the cat among the pigeons with his speech on the British economy on Friday ( Andy Haldane was ‘off message’ from the story painted by his boss, the useless, confusing and grotesquely overpaid Mark Carney (see my post For months Carney has been going around hinting that the BoE would hike interest rates soon because the UK economy was booming and he wanted to control the racy property market and avoid rising inflation (instead inflation is now slowing fast!).

In contrast, Haldane says that he is “gloomier” about the prospects for the economy than he was a few months ago and thinks that rates will have to stay lower for longer. Now Haldane has ‘form’ in being off message and not following the banker’s line. He even spoke to the Occupy movement in the days of the crisis, suggesting that they had plenty of things to complain about and that the banking system was to blame and needed radical reform (see my post

A little bit more on message was Haldane’s warning that Britain was vulnerable to another round of the Eurozone crisis. This is the line adopted by the UK’s conservative finance minister, George Osborne, who has already suggested any slump in Europe would be the excuse for the downturn in the so-called boom in the UK economy – forecast to be the fastest growing in the G7 this year (see my post,

However, Haldane went off message again in his so-called Twin Peaks speech, when he outlined the fault-lines in the UK economy: falling real-wage growth and flat-lining productivity. On wages, Haldane was brutal: “Growth in real wages has been negative for all bar three of the past 74 months. The cumulative fall in real wages since their pre-recession peak is around 10%. As best we can tell, the length and depth of this fall is unprecedented since at least the mid-1800s!  This has been a jobs-rich, but pay-poor, recovery.”

UK real wages

Haldane has constructed what he called his ‘agony index’: a simple index of real wages, real interest rates and productivity growth. In this blog, I have referred to a ‘misery index’, the sum of the unemployment rate and inflation, as an indicator of misery for the average household ( But in an economy like the UK or the US, where unemployment and inflation have been falling but real wages have collapsed along with productivity and pension returns, Haldane’s agony index is way better.  Haldane’s index shows that the British people and the economy have been in ‘agony’ for the longest time since the 1800s, with the exception of world wars and the early 1970s.

agony index

This is not the sort of thing that the government and Haldane’s boss, Carney, want to hear. But as Haldane said: “The BoE, in common with every other mainstream forecaster, has been forecasting sunshine tomorrow in every year since 2008 – that is, rising real wages, productivity and real interest rates. The heatwave has failed to materialise. The timing of the upturn has been repeatedly put back.” Instead it was a mixed picture of ‘twin peaks’ of agony for average households and ecstasy for richer ones.

To add to Haldane’s argument and refuting the line of the government that the British economy is on the road to sustained recovery and fast growth, official figures on productivity growth in the major economies since the Great Recession have been released. Output per hour in the UK was 17% below the average for the rest of the major G7 industrialised economies in 2013, the widest productivity gap since 1992. On an output per worker basis, UK productivity was 19% below the average for the rest of the G7 in 2013.

productivity compared

And it is getting worse. UK output per hour fell slightly in 2013 compared with 2012, contrasting with an increase of 1.0% across the rest of the G7. UK productivity levels are about the same as in 2007, but 15% below where they ought to be if pre-crisis productivity growth had continued.

And productivity growth matters if overall economic growth is to be sustained. Real GDP growth is a combination of employment growth and productivity growth (output per worker). Employment growth in the UK even with wholesale immigration (and that is going to stopped by a re-elected Tory government) is unlikely to be higher than 1% a year. So to achieve sustained 3% real GDP growth, the minimum necessary to get unemployment down further, reduce the budget deficit and government debt and start to raise real incomes, productivity growth must be at least 2% a year. But instead it is falling.

I have discussed the reason for these chronically bad productivity figures in previous posts ( It’s been a combination of the growth of low value-added self-employment (taxi drivers, cleaners, odd jobbers etc), low skilled part-time, temporary and full-time jobs (Asda, McDonalds, Starbucks etc) and, above all, the lack of new investment in technology to boost the productivity of those working. UK business investment remains in the doldrums, while public sector investment has collapsed (see my post,

UK business investment as % of GDP

What Haldane did not say was why there had been such the fall in real wages and a rise in his agony index. It’s because rather than investment to raise productivity, British capital has opted to squeeze wages and cut costs to try and restore profitability. You see, contrary to the view of neoclassical and Keynesian economics alike, productivity and profitability are not the same thing – indeed they are often contradictory.

Squeezing wages has boosted the rate of exploitation (and raised levels of inequality). But this has failed to raise UK profitability much.

UK rate of profit

The way to raise profits is by new labour-shedding technology that increases productivity and lowers costs. But British capital is reluctant to invest when it is still burdened with spare capacity in old technology and corporate debt. That needs to be liquidated first – in another slump. There is more agony to come yet.

PS a fuller version of this piece has just appeared in the Weekly Worker,

12 thoughts on “UK: the agony and the ecstasy

  1. Reblogged this on Socialist Fight and commented:
    However, Haldane went off message again in his so-called Twin Peaks speech, when he outlined the fault-lines in the UK economy: falling real-wage growth and flat-lining productivity. On wages, Haldane was brutal: “Growth in real wages has been negative for all bar three of the past 74 months. The cumulative fall in real wages since their pre-recession peak is around 10%. As best we can tell, the length and depth of this fall is unprecedented since at least the mid-1800s! This has been a jobs-rich, but pay-poor, recovery.”

    UK real wages

  2. I am surprised to see that wages had risen so much during the nineties. On another note, this stagnation in productivity, massive decrease in wages, collapse in investment and increase of indebtedness is accompanied by yet another real Estate bubble and rising rents. It seems that capitalism has entered a new level of parasitism.

  3. They hyperinflation which has hit the London and New York property market is missing. This has to be contrasted with wage decline. The mass and consistent arrivals from other EZ countries of labour produces a glut in labour hence a massive growth in part time subcontracted zero hours jobs. Seen like this, Britains ‘boom’ is a QE fantasy as the economy becomes ever more debt riddent from the last financial crash and going into the next one, the explosion will be much greater as we will have ‘too big to fail’ banks going under and offloading their debts to the world.

  4. Why are you so convinced the Tories will win, Michael? Here in Australia the neo-liberal project is in deep trouble. I know the levels of masochism among the English working-class are high, but they cannot be that bad, surely? Also, I am not so sure UKIP will self-destruct with first past the post that could make Milliband the accidental Prime Minister.


    1. The neoliberal project is becoming stronger here, in Brazil. People are supporting things, that includes my father, which suffered cuts in the 90’s by the same party. I am talking about middle class here, a very high one in relation to the average citizen. But many of the poor in the more industrialized regions, will vote for the neo liberal. And if you doubt call English working class can be masochist, then, with our levels of poverty, let’s say people just wish to swim in scalding oil.

      The only way I can see as a justification for this is the big media strength, at service of the elite. See Manufacturing Consent, Noam Chomsky.

      1. Hi Daniel

        thank you for commenting. I am Irish, Daniel, so you will have to forgive me for having a go at the English. It comes with my DNA! In Australia voting is compulsory. In England it is optional. In England the working class simply walk away from politics. They do not vote. As a result, neo-liberals have it easier. In Australia, though, after the austerity budget the government’s popularity plummeted and has not recovered. If an election were to happen now, the neo-liberals would be defeated even allowing for the role of the Murdoch media.

        Re Brazil, my ignorance is my shame. My best guess though is that for neo-liberals to become popular, then there must have been a whole series of betrayal by the social democrats.

        best regards


      2. Yes, it’s compulsory here. But it really doesn’t matter. If it is optional, it just a bit more work for the big media to make people vote. And yes, you are right about the social democrats.

      3. From what I gather, the Western ‘democracies’ are behind Rousseff ‘s opponent for their well known economic and geopolitical calculations. How much validity is there behind this claim?

  5. The main cause of the rise of neoliberal ideology in the UK is the successful assault on the working class by Thatcher and the subsequent turn of Labour away from reformism towards the market. A low level of struggle over a long period leads to passivity among workers and greater confidence among the ruling class to push through attacks. But the crisis of authority that has developed in UK politics, accelerated by austerity, means that the Tories still don’t have it all their own way. They only achieved power by going into coalition and are becoming more divided with the growth of UKIP.

    Without a strong left, UKIP have taken advantage of anti-government sentiment. We need a united left that helps build strikes and protests against austerity because without successful struggle as a pole of attraction towards the left, UKIP will continue to pull popular discontent about the establishment towards the right. UKIP is a very dangerous phenomenon that needs to be challenged.

  6. Comrade, the version of this article on the WW website contains a significant error. Janan Ganesh is referred to at one point as “Janesh Ganesh” (right before the section entitled ‘Profligacy and austerity’).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: