A budget for UKIP not ‘hardworking people’

The British government’s annual budget for the fiscal year beginning in April 2014 was a budget for potential UKIP voters.  The UK Independence party is riding high in the polls and likely to take huge votes away from the main parties in the upcoming Euro elections in May.   The average age of potential voters in elections in the UK is now 49 years.  UKIP voters are mainly older and many are not working.  They are relatively poor pensioners with just some savings, small business people about to retire and generally don’t have children of school age.

So the main proposals in the budget presented by Conservative chancellor to parliament, Gideon ‘George’ Osborne, are measures aimed at them.  There are special high interest bonds for pensioners, higher tax-free savings schemes and the removal of compulsory annuities in pensions when retiring.

Despite much talk from multi-millionaire Osborne and his fellow Etonian millionaire primate minister David Cameron of ‘hard-working people’ (mentioned at least half a dozen times in their speeches), there was little of nothing for ‘hard-working families’.

There was a rise in threshold for paying income tax from £10,200 a year to 10,500 a year, but this would only provide an extra £56 a year to such income earners and only £26 a year for those who don’t pay social security contributions.  Three-quarters of the cash gains from lifting the allowance will go to the top half of the income distribution.  And the increase will only take an additional 200,000 people out of tax.

There is an increase in the subsidy for child care, but the government’s support for hardworking families in child care is the lowest in Europe.  Two million families will be offered up to a maximum £2,000 a year of state help per child towards the costs of care.  The government says this is 20% of costs of £10,000 a year but average full-time childcare costs for a ‘hardworking family’ with a two-year-old and a five-year-old are estimated at £11,700 a year by the Family and Childcare Trust.  So the ‘help’ is really only 17%.

An extra £50m has also been found to provide extra help for children aged three or four from the poorest families.  But the ‘subsidy’ scheme would benefit most the better-off earners with both parents working ‘hard’ on incomes of up to £150,000 each.  And here is the secret: the actual spending on childcare of £750m won’t rise at all because the Treasury has revised its estimate of the number of families likely to be eligible for the scheme down from 2.5 million to 1.9 million!

‘Hard-working people’ who do not earn enough so that they qualify for benefits and ‘universal credit’ to top up their incomes from work – the so-called working poor – get nothing from this budget at all.  And remember the majority of people who are not pensioners and who get state benefits are working.  Instead the government is imposing a ‘cap’ on welfare spending and extending this cap to end of the decade.  As pensions are not being capped, that means the reductions in benefits for everybody else are huge.  The austerity for the ‘hard-working’ poor will continue with a vengeance.  On the government’s plans, spending on day-to-day services will be reduced to their lowest share of GDP since 1948 (the post-war austerity).  And only a third of the cuts have been implemented so far.

And there is no help at all for young people.  They are without children, without pensions, without savings and in many cases, without jobs or paying huge student fees.  The latest youth unemployment rate is still close to 20% of 16-24 year olds, or just under one million.  Underemployment, as measured by those working part time because they cannot get a full-time job, is 1.4m.  While overall employment rose to over 30 million in early 2014, the unemployment rate remains above 7%, well above the level before the Great Recession.

But don’t worry says Osborne.  His government’s plans are working.  He made much of the pick-up in national output growth that had taken place in 2013 and gleefully reported that the independent Office for Budget Responsibility was revising its forecasts up to 2.7% real growth in 2014 and something similar for every year onwards.

But the UK economy has been one of the slowest to recover of the major economies and even if this growth forecast is achieved in 2014, it will have taken six years for national output to have returned to its previous pre-crisis level – what a waste of resources and prosperity.

UK growth

Indeed, real incomes for ‘hard-working people’ have still not stopped falling.  Average weekly earnings in the UK, between November and January, rose by 1.4% still below the rise in the official price index of almost 1.9%.  This will be the sixth year of the squeeze on average real earnings.  For young workers, real incomes have fallen over 12% in that period.  Workers in the private sector have seen no real rises since 2009 and those in the public sector will see none before 2018 at the earliest.

And all this to ‘balance the budget’ and get public debt down – deficits and debt caused by the bailout of corrupt banks and the loss of incomes from the huge economic recession.  Even if the government’s forecasts prove correct, the budget deficit, still at 6.6% of GDP in 2014 (way higher than most economies including those in the Eurozone), will not balance until 2019.  The public sector debt is now near 100% of GDP – that’s gross, not the net debt figure of 78% that the government likes to quote.  And that will not fall at all this decade.

UK deficit worst in West by 2015 200313

The UK’s economic growth pick-up is based not on increased business investment or exports, both are in the doldrums.  It is founded on a government-stimulated housing boom through cheap credit and subsidies for home purchasers, against all the principles of a ‘free market’.  This has driven home prices through the roof, but mainly in the better-off parts of London.

This expansion is unproductive and fictitious and cannot sustain real growth.  UK productivity growth is non-existent and the government’s forecast of huge expansion in exports is a pipe dream.  This will all end in more tears for hardworking families.

One Response to “A budget for UKIP not ‘hardworking people’”

  1. vallebaeza Says:

    Reblogged this on Econo Marx 21.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: